Skip to main content

The thing about conditionals

One of the trouble areas for English students from intermediate level up is the use of conditional sentences. More than learning the formula, e.g.

[If + clause in present simple, main clause in future tense]

If Rio is selected to host the 2016 Olympics, it will bring a lot of investment to the city and benefits for the population.

The problems come up when we have mixed conditionals,or when we make reference to a past action which conditioned the result of the present:

If the U.N. had imposed sanctions on North Korea more than two years ago, when their nuclear testing program was still a rumor, then they would not be scrambling to think of how to punish the beloved Leader, Kim Jong-Il.

Having said that, here is an interesting situation - which of these sound more "correct":

If Fran and John got married, they would have lived in Australia forever.

If Fran and John got married, they would be living in Australia forever.

If Fran and John got married, they would have been living in Australia forever.

If Fran and John had gotten married, they would be living in Australia forever.

If Fran and John had gotten married, they would have been living in Australia forever.

Any views?

Comments

hey teacher, what's up?
nice to find out ur blog. congratulations!

my view on tha situation of this last post goes to the 4th one:

"if f. and j. had gotten married, they woul be living in a. forever."

hope it is correct.
bye bye.
s.
morena said…
hi!

All of the sentences seem correct to me! but meaning different things!

morena
dablog said…
But what exactly?

Popular posts from this blog

My takeaways from BrELT on the Road

Just in!





Coincidence or not, propositions and concepts echoed through the plenaries and concurrent sessions I attended (apologies in advance to those I could not even attend in spirit at the same time).
Jamie Keddie encouraged us to use video to let students create their own narratives and not to limit this resource to practicing target language. Thru video, students can see there are multiple perspectives that contribute to a story and we have individual interpretations of that story. In so doing, they understand there is no right or wrong - we construct meaning based on our pre-conceived notions of reality. This awareness pivotal to critical thinking. The beauty of it all is that we benefit just as much from this method as our students.
Prodding students to see differently or see the unobvious was at the heart of Claire Venables' session "Not a box". By asking students to find new uses and meanings for a box, we are giving young learners a chance to learn language that i…

Yes we can speak English

Guess I'm a sucker for projects and project-based learning. Although this latest endeavor might not be considered a project in itself.
A simple Google search on the use of Whatsapp or other instant communication tools for English-speaking skills development came up with an extensive list of results.
The idea of creating a group to practice speaking had a specific target group - English teachers who are taking an online postgraduate course on language teaching. Many of them miss the chance to brush up on their oral skills, for the simple reason that the classes are online and interaction with the professor and colleagues comes only through text. 
The initiative rekindled a professional goal I had set for myself when I created the blog Help a teacher with their English (it has been discontinued - all related posts will show up here in the future). Nothing like being able to follow through on an idea and see it materialize into something you had not even fathomed in the first place.
Wha…

Learning is truly ongoing - practicing too

https://twitter.com/CHitch94/status/1002905413778583552?s=09